Arbitrage in the foreign exchange market: Turning on the microscope
ABSTRACT
This paper provides real-time evidence on the frequency, size, duration and
economic significance of arbitrage opportunities in the foreign exchange
market. We investigate deviations from the covered interest rate parity (CIP)
condition using a unique data set for three major capital and foreign exchange
markets that covers a period of more than seven months at tick frequency.
The analysis unveils that: i) short-lived violations of CIP arise; ii) the size of
CIP violations can be economically significant; iii) their duration is, on average,
high enough to allow agents to exploit them, but low enough to explain why
such opportunities have gone undetected in much previous research using
data at lower frequency.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CIP(Covered Interest rate Parity) in the FX Market
where : domestic interest rate , : foreign interest rate, F : forward exchange rate, S : Spot exchange rate
No-arbitrage condition
where a : ask rate, b : bid rate
Data and Calculations of Returns from Arbitrage
formulas used for the calculations
- where the first term on the right-hand side of each equation represents market swap
points for a given maturity obtained from Reuters, while the second term represents the
corresponding derived swap points
- it is profitable if above formulas are positive.
data
February 13 to September 30 2004 from Reuters. major three exchange rates at four different maturities : 1, 3, 6, 12 months.
Frequency, Size, Duration and Economic Significance of Arbitrage Opportunities
Frequency and Size
Duration
Robustness and Further Analysis
Are Arbitrage Opportunities Genuine or Due to Stale Quotes
Is Any of the Assets Involved in Arbitrage Priced Using No-arbitrage Conditions
Day of the Week and Hours of the Day Effects
The Role of Market Pace and Volatility
References
Aliber R.Z., Chowdhry B., Yan S., 2003. Some evidence that a Tobin tax on foreign exchange transactions may increase volatility. European Finance Review 7, 481–510.
Bjønnes G.H., Rime D., 2005. Dealer behavior and trading systems in foreign exchange markets. Journal of Financial Economics 75, 571–605.
Branson W.H., 1969. The minimum covered interest differential needed for international arbitrage activity. Journal of Political Economy 77, 1028–1035.
Clinton K., 1988. Transaction costs and covered interest arbitrage: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy 96, 358–370.
Covrig V., Melvin M., 2002. Asymmetric information and price discovery in the FX market: Does tokyo know more about the yen? Journal of Empirical Finance 9, 271–285.
Dan ́ıelsson J., Payne R., 2002. Liquidity determination in an order driven market. type-script, London School of Economics, FMG.
Evans M.D.D., 2002. FX trading and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Finance 57,2405–2447.
Evans M.D.D., Lyons R.K., 2002. Order flow and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy 110, 170–180.
Evans M.D.D., Lyons R.K., 2005. Meese-Rogoff redux: Micro-based exchange-rate fore-casting. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 95, 405–414.
Fletcher D.J., Taylor L.W., 1996. “SWAP” covered interest parity in long-date capital markets. Review of Economics and Statistics 78, 530–538.
Frenkel J.A., 1973. Elasticities and the interest parity theory. Journal of Political Economy 81, 741–747.
Frenkel J.A., Levich R.M., 1975. Covered interest arbitrage: Unexploited profits. Journal of Political Economy 83, 325–338.
Frenkel J.A., Levich R.M., 1977. Transaction costs and interest arbitrage: Tranquil versus turbulent periods. Journal of Political Economy 85, 1209–1226.
Grossman S.J., Stiglitz J.E., 1976. Information and competitive price systems. American Economic Review 66, 246–252.
Grossman S.J., Stiglitz J.E., 1980. On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review 70, 393–408.
Juhl T., Miles W., Weidenmier M.D., 2006. Covered interest arbitrage: Then versus now Economica 73, 341–352.
Lyons R.K., 1995. Tests of microstructural hypothesis in the foreign exchange market. Journal of Financial Economics 39, 321–351.
Lyons R.K., 2001. The Microstructure Approach to Exchange Rates. MIT Press, Cam-bridge, MA.
22
Lyons R.K., Moore M., 2005. An information approach to international currencies. Working Paper 11220, NBER.
O’Hara M., 1995. Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.Osler C.L., 2000. Support for resistance: Technical analysis and intraday exchange rates.
Federal Rerserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 6, 53–68.
Osler C.L., 2003. Currency orders and exchange-rate dynamics: Explaining the success of technical analysis. Journal of Finance 58, 1791–1821.
Osler C.L., 2005. Stop-loss orders and price cascades in currency markets. Journal of International Money and Finance 24, 219–241.
Payne R., 2003. Informed trade in spot foreign exchange markets: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Economics 61, 307–329.
Reuters, 1999. An Introduction to Foreign Exchange & Money Markets. Reuters Financial Training Series, Wiley, Singapore and New York.
Rhee S.G., Chang R.P., 1992. Intra-day arbitrage opportunities in foreign exchange and eurocurrency markets. Journal of Finance 47, 363–379.
Sarno L., 2005. Towards a solution to the puzzles in exchange rate economics: Where do we stand? Canadian Journal of Economics 38, 673–708.
Sarno L., Taylor M.P., 2001. The Microstructure of the Foreign-Exchange Market: A Selective Survey of the Literature. No. 89 in Princeton Studies in International Economics,Princeton Univeristy.
Shleifer A., Vishny R.W., 1997. The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance 52, 35–55.
Taylor M.P., 1987. Covered interest parity: A high-frequency, high-quality data study.Economica 54, 429–438.
Taylor M.P., 1989. Covered interest arbitrage and market turbulence. Economic Journal99, 376–391.